Comments on: But You Click! http://zaissianlogic.com/design/2005/11/but-you-click/ Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:36:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: zsz http://zaissianlogic.com/design/2005/11/but-you-click/comment-page-1/#comment-1423 zsz Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:00:58 +0000 http://zaissianlogic.com/2005/11/13/but-you-click/#comment-1423 Ah Dave, good for you for keeping me honest. Finding a color with greater contrast has been on my to do list for a while, since the template colors are kinda bland (especially the visited colors - ick). However, the content links <em>do</em> use hover-based underlining and color distinction, whereas the example I mentioned specifically took away color distinction and underlining to use bold as the only method of contrast. I just don't think bold has much precedence as a link (except as a redundant cue when used for titles, which, you're right, my blog does use). Ah Dave, good for you for keeping me honest. Finding a color with greater contrast has been on my to do list for a while, since the template colors are kinda bland (especially the visited colors – ick).

However, the content links do use hover-based underlining and color distinction, whereas the example I mentioned specifically took away color distinction and underlining to use bold as the only method of contrast. I just don’t think bold has much precedence as a link (except as a redundant cue when used for titles, which, you’re right, my blog does use).

]]> By: Dave Young http://zaissianlogic.com/design/2005/11/but-you-click/comment-page-1/#comment-1424 Dave Young Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:18 +0000 http://zaissianlogic.com/2005/11/13/but-you-click/#comment-1424 um… dude, even your blog doesn’t underline links. it uses bold and a very slight color disctinction. egg on you!@ ;D ave um… dude, even your blog doesn’t underline links. it uses bold and a very slight color disctinction.

egg on you!@

;D ave

]]>